James wanted a popular translation that supported standard Church of England usages
The editorsKing James gave the Puritans almost nothing of what they wanted, except a new Bible translation
A. Kenneth CurtisAndrewes caught James’s eye as the perfect lead translator
Chris R. ArmstrongFrom the “skin of your teeth” to “sour grapes,” many English idioms are Hebrew sayings the KJV translated literally
Alistair McGrathThe King James Version was not by any means the first English-language Bible
David Lyle JeffreyHow the Lord’s Prayer sounded in early English Bibles (Luke’s version)
David Lyle JeffreyFans of the KJV like to think their favorite Bible burst onto the scene in 1611 with all the fanfare such a masterpiece deserved. Here’s the real story
A. Kenneth CurtisSome Jews objected to the KJV’s Christian interpretation of Old Testament passages
Ann T. SnyderThe colonies started fresh in a lot of areas, but Bible translation wasn’t one of them; overwhelmingly, the KJV has been the U.S. Bible of choice
Chris R. ArmstrongThe plain sense of a KJV text from one of his letters certainly seems to prove it. But wait . . .
Roger L. OmansonIf this issue has piqued your interest in the KJV, here are some further windows into the history, language, and legacy of this translation
The EditorsChristianity and theater
Awakenings
Stories worth retelling
Revival: the first thousand years
Containing today’s events, devotional, quote and stories